{"id":4578,"date":"2024-02-09T08:17:19","date_gmt":"2024-02-09T08:17:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/viac.hofmann.solutions\/?page_id=4578"},"modified":"2026-02-24T13:39:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-24T13:39:00","slug":"case-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/rules-and-tools-at-a-glance\/resources-at-a-glance\/case-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Case Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”rgba(11,11,11,0.29)” background_image=”https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Wien_-_Justizpalast_Stiege_mit_Justitia-scaled.jpg” background_position=”top_left” background_horizontal_offset=”0%” background_vertical_offset=”67%” background_blend=”darken” custom_padding=”||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#ffffff” max_width=”935px” module_alignment=”left” custom_margin=”280px||||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.24.3″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” text_font_size=”18px” header_font=”|700|||||||” header_text_align=”left” header_text_color=”#0B0B0B” custom_padding=”|80px||80px|false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

Case Law<\/h1>\n

VIAC has listed below a selection of arbitration-related decisions rendered by the Austrian Supreme Court in chronological order between 1954 and 2021. There is a link to the full text of the German language decision as available on the Austrian Legal Information System (RIS).<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” max_width=”1050px” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_toggle title=”2026″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.01.2026<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/25b<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/span><\/td>\n unsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nAward on Jurisdiction, Validity of arbitration agreement; the arbitral award concerns a dispute to which the arbitration agreement does not apply<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.01.2026<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc4\/25w<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nAppointment of Arbitrators<\/span><\/td>\nsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nAppointment of Arbitrators<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12.01.2026<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc3\/25y<\/span><\/a><\/td>\nAppointment of Arbitrators<\/span><\/td>\n unsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nAppointment of the arbitral tribunal<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2025″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.07.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/25h<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\n unsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nValidity of arbitration agreement; right to be heard and public policy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.07.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/25f<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\n unsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nValidity of arbitration agreement; right to be heard and public policy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.05.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg4\/24y<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\n unsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nValidity of arbitration agreement; Right to be heard – hearing just concering jurisdiction; public policy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.05.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/24a<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nChallenge of arbitrator after award – application founded; ordre public<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.02.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/25d<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/span><\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nAppointment of Chairperson<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.01.2025<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc3\/24x<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/span><\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nAppointment of Chairperson<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2024″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.10.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob33\/24t<\/a><\/td>\nJurisdiction<\/span><\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/span><\/td>\nContent of conciliation clause; \u00d6NORM<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.10.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/24g<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/span><\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nViolation of substantive and procedural public policy; violation of the right to be heard; violation of fundamental values of the Austrian legal system – reimbursement of costs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
06.08.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/24b<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		successful<\/td>\nExistence of an arbitration agreement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30.7.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONC2\/24z<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\nAppointment of the arbitration tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25.06.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob46\/24d<\/a><\/td>\nRevision appeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nAction to determine the existence or non-existence of an arbitration agreement is not admissible in an ordinary court<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03.04.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/22y<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/span><\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nLack of objective arbitrability, objective arbitrability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26.03.2024<\/strong><\/td>\n2Nc13\/24w<\/a><\/td>\nNotification of bias<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nBias of judges of the Senate of the Supreme Court responsible for arbitration proceedings due to their membership in the VIAC Presidium<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2023″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.09.2023<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/23f<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nClaim dismissed due to lack of form<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11.03.2023<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/22a<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nValidity of arbitration agreement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2022″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28.09.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/22z<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		successful<\/td>\nAppointment of the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16.09.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/22a<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside
proceeding<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\nsetting aside of an arbitral award;
electronic file<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
08.09.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob80\/22v<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nRecognition and declaration of
enforceability; BIT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.06.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob79\/22a<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nJoinder of a third party;
pending proceedings;
termination of proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02.06.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/22z<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		successful<\/td>\nAppointment of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04.05.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/a><\/strong>18OCg1\/22d<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside
proceeding<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\nviolation of the ordre public;
violation of Austrian law;
arbitrary application of the law;
contradictory assessment of the facts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.03.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/22z<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\nAppointment of arbitrators;
pending proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.02.2022<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/22z<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of
arbitrators<\/td>\n		successful<\/td>\nAppointment of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2021″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15.12.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg5\/21s<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nViolation of the right to be heard; possibility to comment on the decision on costs; excess of powers of the arbitral tribunal; violation of the ordre public; non-conformity with matters in the record; arbitrariness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.10.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>3Ob152\/21f<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nValidity of an arbitration agreement under foreign law; Execution of an award; Case-by-case assessment for arbitration agreements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.09.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc5\/21m<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nFailure to appoint an arbitrator; Appointment by the court; jurisdiction of the Austrian Supreme Court<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.09.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/21z<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nViolation of the right to be heard; violation of the ordre public;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.09.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc6\/21h<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nChallenge of arbitrators – application unfounded<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21.07.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n1Ob121\/21g<\/a><\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\narbitral tribunal of an association; formation of a functioning arbitral tribunal; inactivity of an arbitrator; appealing to the arbitral tribunal is unreasonable; litigation without arbitration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.04.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>9ObA47\/20g<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nadmissibility and content of conciliation agreements; gross unfairness<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.04.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob36\/21d<\/a><\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ncontract for the benefit of third parties; scope of the arbitration agreement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.04.2021
<\/strong><\/td>\n		4Ob43\/21h<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ncontract for the benefit of third parties; scope of the arbitration agreement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14.04.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/21b<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nPrivate foundation; lack of jurisdiction; declaration of foundation equals articles of association; latest procedural laws are applied<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.03.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob2\/21x<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nrefusal of recognition and declaration of enforceability of an annulled foreign arbitral award (Art V (1) (e) NYC); violation of public policy (Art V (2) (b) NYC)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a024.03.2021<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n9ObA4\/21k<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nobjection to jurisdiction; agreement to arbitrate constitutes procedural bar to claiming the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02.03.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg10\/19y<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nexcess of powers of the arbitral tribunal; public policy; right to be heard (surprising decision); decision based on principles of fairness and equitability; applicable law; choice of law – principal contract as an indication for a conclusive choice of law; interpretation; arbitrability; derogation from the arbitral tribunals’ obligation to conduct an oral hearing; the necessity to conduct an oral hearing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17.02.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg5\/20i<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\naction for annulment of an arbitral award on the grounds of bias of the sole arbitrator, on the grounds of alleged serious procedural violations; violation of the right for clarification and correction of the arbitral award; form of the arbitration agreement; lack of form relating to the power of attorney; exceeding of the parties’ request for relief<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20.01.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob127\/20b<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nthe relation between state jurisdiction and arbitration (Sec. 584 paragraph 1 ZPO); admissibility of optional arbitration agreements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a020.01.2021<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n3Ob198\/20v<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nproceedings for a declaration of enforceability of foreign arbitral awards, review of the public policy violation of a decision on legal costs; primacy of intergovernmental agreements – specifically the 1954 Hague Convention on Legal Costs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19.01.2021<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc5\/20k<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators – application unfounded<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2020″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/10\/2020<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob136\/20h<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ninterpretation of the arbitration agreement; scope of the arbitration agreement; competence of the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/09\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/a>18OCg6\/20m<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nThe arbitral tribunal wrongly denied its jurisdiction; interpretation of an arbitration agreement; analogous application of \u00a7 611 para. 2 no. 1 2nd case ZPO)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/09\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n8Ob77\/20m<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ndifferentiation between conciliation panels (“Schlichtungseinrichtung”) and arbitral tribunals; interpretation of association statutes (Sec 577 et seqq. ZPO); arbitrability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/09\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob28\/20s<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitrability; liquidation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/07\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/20w\u00a0<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitrability; public policy; conflicts of interest of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/07\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc2\/20v<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/07\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/20x<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – contact between arbitrator and party representative; IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/07\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc3\/20s<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nChallenge of arbitrators; admissibility of conducting an arbitration hearing by means of a video conference – performance despite opposition of a party; Art 6 ECHR; due process<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/07\/2020
<\/strong><\/td>\n		18Ocg1\/20a<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy – assessment standard; sham trial; inadmissibility of r\u00e9vision au fond<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
07\/07\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n5Ob27\/20m<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nlegal consequences resulting from the invalidity of an expert contract for the binding character of an expert determination<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18\/06\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg4\/20t<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nrequirement of translation of the arbitral award<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a026\/05\/2020<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>9Ob18\/20t<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ndifferentiation between arbitral awards and expert determinations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26\/05\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n2Nc16\/20f<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of judges in state court proceedings
related to arbitration proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
09\/04\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc3\/19i<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nlegal representation not required in setting aside proceedings –
no interruption of proceedings due to death of party representative<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
06\/03\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg7\/19g<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\napplicable law, choice of law; application for legal aid;
public policy – degree of domestic nexus of award decisive<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a006\/03\/2020<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n18OCg11\/19w<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nvalidity of the arbitration agreement – public authorities<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/01\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg12\/19t<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy – reimbursement of costs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/01\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg6\/18h<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nRom I Regulation – not applicable in arbitration proceedings as well as
in related state court proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/01\/2020<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg9\/19a<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nright to be heard – application to take evidence;
public policy – arbitral hearings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2019″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/12\/2019<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>18ONc 3\/19i<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nscope of the arbitration agreement – non-signatories;
conflicts of interest of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/11\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob13\/19m<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy – consultations and votes within the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
09\/10\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>2Nc38\/19i<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of judges in state court proceedings related
to arbitration proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/10\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>18OCg5\/19p<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – assertion after the
end of the arbitration proceedings; public policy (Art 10 ECHR)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/10\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc2\/19t<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – assessment standard and time limit; about the arbitrator’s behavior during an arbitration hearing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29\/08\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob142\/19d<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nuniversal application of the New York Convention<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/05\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/19z<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nexceeding the request for relief; right to be heard –
application to take evidence; public policy – lack of reasoning; revison au fond<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/05\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg6\/19k<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – personnel interrelations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15\/05\/2019
<\/strong><\/td>\n		18OCg6\/18h<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\napplicable law, choice of law; scope of the arbitration agreement
(organs of legal entities); right to be heard (application to take evidence)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18\/02\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/19x<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitral tribunals in the meaning of Sec. 577 ZPO (association conciliation panels)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14\/02\/2019<\/strong><\/td>\n2Nc6\/19h<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of judges – in state court proceedings
related to arbitration proceedings<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a017\/01\/2019<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n5Ob63\/18b<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ntime limitation of arbitration agreements<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2018″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/12\/2018<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob153\/18y<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nenforceability of an arbitral award<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30\/11\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg5\/18m<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\ndifferentiation between arbitral awards and expert determinations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/11\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg6\/18h<\/a><\/td>\napplication purusant to Art 53 EuGVVO<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconfirmation of an application pursuant to Art 53 Rom I Regulation; exemption under Art 1 para 2 d Rom I Regulation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
09\/10\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/18w<\/a><\/td>\nSetting aside proceedings<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nvalidity of the arbitration agreement; foreclosure of the ground for setting aside; requirement of the written form; right to be heard; public policy; reasoning of the arbitral award<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21\/08\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/18y<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\napplication to set aside an arbitral award<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/03\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/17x<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
06\/02\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc4\/17h<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17\/01\/2018<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob195\/17w<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\nform requirement – power of attorney to conclude an arbitration agreement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2017″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21\/12\/2017<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob104\/17p<\/a><\/td>\nrecission proceeding
(shareholders resolution)<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\narbitration clauses in corporate statutes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21\/12\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob178\/17w<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ninterpretation of arbitral awards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
07\/09\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/17t<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
04\/07\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob118\/17z<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nenforceability of arbitral awards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30\/05\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob92\/17h<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\naward set aside by wrong court<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
02\/03\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg6\/16f<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nsports arbitration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/03\/2017<\/strong><\/td>\n5Ob72\/16y<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\npartially successful<\/td>\narbitration agreement; choice of law and European Union law<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2016″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
06\/12\/2016<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg5\/16h<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy; right to be heard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10\/10\/2016<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/strong><\/a>7Nc18\/16f<\/a><\/td>\nApplication pursuant to JN Sec. 28 (1) 2<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitration before CIETAC – not infeasible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/09\/2016<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/16i<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\npartially successful<\/td>\nProcedural Public Order – lack of reasoning<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/09\/2016<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/16t<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npending arbitration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/02\/2016<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg3\/15p<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy; inadmissibility of r\u00e9vision au fond; right to be heard – standard of review before the OGH (Supreme Court); scope of the request for relief – no excess of powers by the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”2006 – 2015″ open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\nType of proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome of<\/strong>
the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/td>\n		Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/06\/2015<\/b><\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg1\/15v<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceedings<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\napplicable law; choice of law – principal contract as an indication for a conclusive choice of law<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/06\/2015<\/strong><\/td>\n18OCg2\/15s<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceedings<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy; right to be heard; no excess of powers by the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/08\/2014<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc1\/14p<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – personnel interrelations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/08\/2014<\/strong><\/td>\n18ONc2\/14k<\/a><\/td>\nchallenge of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconflicts of interest of arbitrators – personnel interrelations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19\/04\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob42\/12p<\/a><\/td>\nrecission proceeding
(shareholders resolution)<\/td>\n		unsuccessful<\/td>\narbitrability of actions for nullity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18\/04\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob44\/12k<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nprovisional measures (Brussels I-Regulation)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18\/04\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob38\/12b<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nright to be heard<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13\/04\/2011<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob154\/10h<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy – consultations and votes within the arbitral tribunal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24\/05\/2010<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob25\/10p<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitration and the CMR (Convention on the Contract for the
International Carriage of Goods by Road)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/05\/2010<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob216\/09d<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconfirmation of finality and enforceability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
27\/01\/2010<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob225\/09i<\/a>
<\/strong>(7Ob256\/09m)<\/a><\/td>\n		appeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ninterim and protective measures<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a022\/07\/2009<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob144\/09m<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nconsumer related issues in arbitration<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a030\/03\/2009<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob266\/08f<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nsuccessful<\/td>\napplicable law and extension of an arbitration agreement to third parties<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/10\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob170\/08f<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nbinding effect of awards and third party intervention (Art 6 ECHR)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
03\/09\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob35\/08f<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\npartially successful<\/td>\nauthentification and certification of an award (NYC)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
26\/08\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob80\/08f<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\npartially successful<\/td>\nscope of the arbitration clause<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20\/08\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n9Ob53\/08x<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy; due process; challenge of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
01\/04\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n5Ob272\/07x<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\npublic policy (Law on Restitution of Art Objects of 1998)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
28\/02\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n8Ob4\/08h<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nliability of arbitrators<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05\/02\/2008<\/strong><\/td>\n10Ob120\/07f<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ntime limit for the challenge of an arbitral award<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23\/10\/2007
<\/strong><\/td>\n		3Ob141\/07t<\/a><\/td>\nenforcement proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nenforcement under the New York Convention and the
requirement of a special power of attorney<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
07\/08\/2007<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob142\/07x<\/a><\/td>\nappeal<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\narbitration agreement – separability and writing requirement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a022\/02\/2007<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n3Ob281\/06d<\/a><\/td>\nsetting aside proceeding<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\ninterpretation of arbitration agreements and setting aside of arbitral awards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
30\/11\/2006<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob207\/06v<\/a><\/td>\nappointment of arbitrators<\/td>\nunsuccessful<\/td>\nduty of disclosure and arbitrators’ fees<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][et_pb_toggle title=”vor SchiedsR\u00c4G 2006 (bis 1.7.2006)” open_toggle_text_color=”#0b0b0b” closed_toggle_background_color=”#707070″ icon_color=”#ffffff” toggle_icon=”0||divi||400″ open_icon_color=”#CD2C24″ open_toggle_icon=”/||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” title_text_color=”#ffffff” title_font=”|700|||||||” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/strong><\/td>\n\n

Type of proceeding<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Outcome of<\/strong>
the<\/strong>
proceeding<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

Subject<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22.05.2006<\/strong><\/td>\n10Ob3\/06y<\/a><\/td>\n\n

appeal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

scope of statutory arbitration clauses<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

26.04.2006<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob211\/05h<\/a><\/td>\n\n

enforcement proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

translation of an arbitral award, dissenting opinions and
deliberations of the arbitral tribunal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

26.04.2006<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob236\/05i<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

validity of the arbitration agreement – applicable law<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

29.03.2006<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob64\/06x<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

arbitration agreement – requirement of
a written special power of attorney<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

08.03.2006<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob252\/05t<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

advance on costs – no setting aside of
preliminary or interim decisions<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

challenge of arbitrators<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a026.01.2005<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n7Ob314\/04h<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

partially successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

annual interest rate – Austrian public policy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

26.01.2005<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob221\/04b<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

challenge of arbitrators<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

challenge of arbitrators<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

15.09.2004<\/strong><\/td>\n9ObA94\/04w<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

right to be heard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

recission proceeding
(shareholders resolution)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

arbitrability of the matter in dispute<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

28.05.2003<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob96\/03y<\/a><\/td>\n\n

recission proceeding
(shareholders resolution)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

arbitrability of the matter in dispute<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

annual interest rate – Austrian public policy<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

18.12.2002<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob265\/02z<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

partially successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

interpretation of an arbitration agreement<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

right to be heard<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

03.04.2001<\/strong><\/td>\n4Ob37\/01x<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

principle of separability<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

unsuccessful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

constitution of the arbitral tribunal (chairperson)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

10.12.1998<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob221\/98w<\/a><\/td>\n\n

setting aside proceeding<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

successful<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal – ex aequo et bono<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

15.09.1998<\/strong><\/td>\n7Ob229\/98x<\/a><\/td>\nAufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\nnicht erfolgreich<\/span><\/td>\nJahreszinssatz – \u00d6sterreichischer Ordre Public<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
05.05.1998<\/strong><\/td>\n3Ob2372\/96m<\/a><\/td>\nAufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\nteilw. erfolgreich<\/span><\/td>\nAuslegung von Schiedsvereinbarungen<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24.07.1997<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob186\/97i<\/a><\/td>\nAufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\nnicht erfolgreich<\/span><\/td>\nrechtliches Geh\u00f6r<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
06.09.1990<\/strong><\/td>\n6Ob572\/90<\/a><\/td>\n Aufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\nnicht erfolgreich\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\nGrundsatz der Separabilit\u00e4t\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
29.02.1984<\/strong><\/td>\n2Ob516\/84<\/a><\/td>\nAufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\nnicht erfolgreich\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\nSchiedsrichterbestellung (Vorsitzender)<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18.11.1982<\/strong><\/td>\n8Ob520\/82<\/a><\/td>\n Aufhebungsverfahren<\/span><\/td>\n\u00a0erfolgreich<\/span><\/td>\n Zust\u00e4ndigkeit des Schiedsgerichts –
Treu und Glauben<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

[\/et_pb_toggle][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_cta title=”English Translations of Decisions” button_text=”Klicks” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” body_link_font=”|700|||||||” body_link_text_color=”#ffffff” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n

English summaries of some decisions are available. These can be found in the \u2018Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration\u2019, Klausegger\/Klein\/Kremslehner\/Petsche\/Pitkowitz\/Welser\/Zeiler (eds.), C.H.Beck, MANZ Verlag Wien, St\u00e4mpfli Verlag, written by Markus Schifferl with Nikolaus Pitkowitz\/Venus Valentina Wong\/Alexander Zojer. The contributions in the various editions of the Austrian Yearbook are accessible online in the RDB legal database and on the Wolters Kluwer website. Further translations can be found in the Jus Mundi database.<\/p>\n

[\/et_pb_cta][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Case Law VIAC has listed below a selection of arbitration-related decisions rendered by the Austrian Supreme Court in chronological order between 1954 and 2021. There is a link to the full text of the German language decision as available on the Austrian Legal Information System (RIS). Date \u00a0 Type of proceeding Outcome of theproceeding Subject 30.01.2026 18OCg3\/25b setting aside proceeding unsuccessful Award on Jurisdiction, Validity of arbitration agreement; the arbitral award concerns a dispute to which the arbitration agreement does not apply 30.01.2026 18ONc4\/25w Appointment of Arbitrators successful Appointment of Arbitrators 12.01.2026 18ONc3\/25y Appointment of Arbitrators unsuccessful Appointment of the arbitral tribunal Date \u00a0 Type of proceeding Outcome of theproceeding Subject 22.07.2025 18OCg1\/25h setting aside proceeding unsuccessful Validity of arbitration agreement; right to be heard and public policy 22.07.2025 18OCg2\/25f setting aside proceeding unsuccessful Validity of arbitration agreement; right to be heard and public policy 26.05.2025 18OCg4\/24y setting aside proceeding unsuccessful Validity of arbitration agreement; Right to be heard – hearing just concering jurisdiction; public policy 19.05.2025 18OCg3\/24a setting aside proceeding successful Challenge of arbitrator after award – application founded; ordre public 18.02.2025 18ONc1\/25d appointment of arbitrators unsuccessful Appointment of Chairperson 16.01.2025 18ONc3\/24x appointment of arbitrators successful Appointment of Chairperson […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":1203,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4578","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4578"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10913,"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4578\/revisions\/10913"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1203"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viac.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}